US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 159
Henry v. Hospice of Chattanooga, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Warren W. Henry
Defendant:
Hospice of Chattanooga, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hayes v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
as 4:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
James M Hayes
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sloan v. Heil Trailer International, Co. (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kathleen V. Sloan
Defendant:
Heil Trailer International, Co.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC , Kevin Corbett and Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Edmonds v. Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ricky Edmonds
Defendant:
Gestamp Chattanooga, LLC and Gestamp North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Atchley v. Covenant Health et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carlotta Stephens Atchley
Defendant:
Covenant Health and Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Freeman v. AJ & Associates Dental, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Paula Freeman
Defendant:
AJ & Associates Dental, P.C. and Aspen Dental Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Espinoza v. American Esoteric Laboratories, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Cynthia R Espinoza
Defendant:
American Esoteric Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grace v. OrthoTennessee, P.C. (TV1)
as 3:2014cv00588
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Grace
Defendant:
OrthoTennessee, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
King v. Amedisys Holding, LLC
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Frances King
Defendant:
Amedisys Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
