US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 155
Pope v. Amazon.com.dedc, LLC, d/b/a Amazon Fulfillment
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
Amazon.com.dedc,LLC
Plaintiff:
Ben Pope, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Byrd v. Wal-Mart Associates
as 3:2017cv00256
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates
Plaintiff:
Kathy Elaine Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodman v. Whirlpool Corporation (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Justin Goodman
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Daugherty v. Community Health Systems Inc. (TWP2)
as 3:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Daugherty
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Smith v. Matix Corporation of America
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. Smith
Defendant:
Matix Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodwin v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System (TV1)
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brandi Jo Goodwin
Defendant:
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Eaves v. Exel, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00096
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. and Exel Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Emily Eaves
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Payne v. Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc. (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00115
Defendant:
Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Payne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jones et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jones and Patricia Reed
Defendant:
Correctional Medicine Associates, P.C. , CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC and Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Lewis v. McCright & Associates, LLC (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Seteria Lewis
Defendant:
McCright & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
