US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Labor Cases

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,763
Su v. AT Construction Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Julie A Su
Defendant: AT Construction Service, Inc. and Charles Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Driver v. Dan Fitzgerald & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: April Driver
Defendant: Dan Fitzgerald & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tyler v. HomeServ USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Victoria Tyler
Defendant: HomeServ USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Giles v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: Travis Giles
Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Su v. Tuff Torq Corp
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Julie A Su
Defendant: Tuff Torq Corporation
Hayes v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Deloris Hayes
Defendant: Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McCormick v. PB&G Restaurant Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Daniel McCormick
Defendant: PB&G Restaurant Group, LLC, Sammy Peroulas and PB&G Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Pero's Bar and Grill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bridge v. CommonSpirit Health
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: Connie Tuggle Bridge
Defendant: CommonSpirit Health doing business as CHI Memorial
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gilley v. Roadtec, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Michael Gilley
Defendant: ROADTEC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Knoski v. Rocky Top Waffles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Colleen Knoski
Defendant: Rocky Top Waffles, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?