US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,547
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brown
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Lonnita Anderson
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
John Doe #061 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Doe #061
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe (HWB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
John Doe (HWB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
