US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 511
Amerispec, L.L.C. v. Sutko Real Estate Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02365
Defendant:
SRE Home Inspections, Inc., John Sutko, Sutko Real Estate Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Amerispec, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Benham v. Matthews and Associates LLC
as 2:2020cv02309
Defendant:
Matthews and Associates LLC
Plaintiff:
Matthew Benham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Westerkamp v. McNeill Hotel Company, LLC
as 2:2020cv02269
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Finn Westerkamp
Defendant:
McNeill Hotel Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Guthridge v. Beale Street Blues Company, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02189
Plaintiff:
Robert Guthridge
Defendant:
Beale Street Blues Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elam v. Zazzle Inc.
as 2:2020cv02167
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Elam
Defendant:
Zazzle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Fuse, LLC v. LIT Vodka, LLC
as 2:2020cv02163
Plaintiff:
Fuse, LLC
Defendant:
LIT Vodka, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Ryan and Rose, LLC v. Quintessential Tots, LLC
as 2:2020cv02149
Plaintiff:
Ryan and Rose, LLC
Defendant:
Quintessential Tots, LLC d/b/a Itzy Ritzy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hill et al v. Beauregard et al
as 2:2020cv02148
Plaintiff:
Otis Zirker, Donell Barton, Jr., Lamario Starks and others
Defendant:
Malaco Inc, BMG Rights Management US, Paul Beauregard and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Guthridge v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC
as 2:2020cv02137
Plaintiff:
Robert Guthridge
Defendant:
Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hunter Fan Company v. Landmark Technology A, LLC
as 2:2020cv02133
Plaintiff:
Hunter Fan Company
Defendant:
Landmark Technology A, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
