US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,183
Davis v. Parris
as 1:2023cv01142
Petitioner:
Corbyn D. Davis
Respondent:
Michael Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Leeds
as 2:2023cv02416
Petitioner:
Antonio Allen
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Champion v. Leeds
as 1:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Dwight T. Champion
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill-Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02382
Petitioner:
Joshua Hill-Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv02384
Petitioner:
Eric Tyrone Jenkins
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hampton v. Leeds
as 2:2023cv02379
Petitioner:
Charles Hampton
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Petitioner:
Oziel Cantu
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T.D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Levy v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02395
Petitioner:
Marcus Levy
Respondent:
United States of America and Acting Warden Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Wardlow
as 1:2023cv01122
Petitioner:
Stacy Curry
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
