US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,034
Morris et al v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2023cv01221
Plaintiff:
Rick Morris, Thomas O Cowdrey, III, Scott McNutt and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vargas v. Panini America Inc
as 3:2023cv02689
Plaintiff:
Nora Vargas
Defendant:
Panini America Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Matlock
as 3:2023cv02681
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ferguson
Defendant:
Robert Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv02683
Plaintiff:
Oluwabunmi Adebisi Thomas
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Carter v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
Joshua Levy Carter
Defendant:
State of Texas, Brad Randal, City of Garland Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
