US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 32,762
McDonald v. State of Texas
as 2:2024cv00064
Petitioner: Randy Joel McDonald
Respondent: State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner: Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Okoro v. USA
as 3:2024cv00812
Petitioner: Ijeoma Okoro
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hargrave v. Moreno
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: Jim Hargrave, Jimmy Neal Hargrave and Jimmy Neal Younker
Defendant: NFN Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isbell v. Johnson County Sheriff Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00768
Petitioner: Michael Dean Isbell
Respondent: Johnson County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff: Curtis James McGuire
Defendant: Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Fort Worth Medical Center et al
as 3:2024cv00750
Petitioner: Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent: Fort Worth Medical Center, P Velda Bellah, Jeremy Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv00754
Petitioner: Dillon Lyle Jones
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Solarzano v. USA
as 3:2024cv00753
Petitioner: Edgar Solorzano Fierros
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?