US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 8,874
Seaux v. Knight Energy Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Seaux
Defendant:
Knight Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lee v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
as 4:2023cv03725
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Caro v. Cannonball Trucking, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03720
Plaintiff:
Juan Caro
Defendant:
Cannonball Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Resio v. Standard Well Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv03719
Plaintiff:
Robert Resio
Defendant:
Standard Well Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. City of Texas City
as 3:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Minerva Solis
Defendant:
City Of Texas City
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Marcial v. Exterior Creations, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03722
Plaintiff:
Eusebio Marcial
Defendant:
Exterior Creations, Inc. and Casey B. Huff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
O'Connor v. Drilling Tools International, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Connor
Defendant:
Drilling Tools International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sproles v. Rappaport et al
as 4:2023cv03631
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sproles
Defendant:
Jason Rappaport, Tex-Dog Stone Oak LLC, Tex-Dog Hospitality LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bike v. First United Bank & Trust Company
as 4:2023cv03637
Plaintiff:
Kai Bike
Defendant:
First United Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
