Texas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,515
Martinez v. U.S. Expediting & Logistics, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Humberto Alejandro Martinez
Defendant:
U.S. Expediting & Logistics, LLC and Michael Stephen Wages
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Cooks v. Averitt Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
David Cooks
Defendant:
Averitt Express Inc. and Angela Lecomte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cloud v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jason Bradley Cloud
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Evans v. DG Trans Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
DG Trans Inc. and Muhammad Javaid Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nelson v. United States of Amercia
as 4:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Kermisha Nelson
Defendant:
United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Nelson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Kermisha Nelson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Vasquez et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Cesar Vasquez and Mayra Vasquez
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Livingston v. Load One, LLC
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Erika Livingston
Defendant:
Load One, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Briggs v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael Briggs
Defendant:
Jordan Smith and New Prime Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Karimi v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
Abdul Karimi
Defendant:
Donnie Eugene Conway and Octane Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
