US District Court for the District of Utah Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,962
Chavez v. Jenkins
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Melissa Chavez
Defendant:
Cedric Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Serrano et al v. Lehi City et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donnalyn Serrano and Jose Serrano
Defendant:
Lehi City and Russell Poulsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Beales et al v. Duffield et al
as 2:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Toren Beales, Carli Brady and Michael Srygler
Defendant:
Thomas Duffield and Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paciorek v. Utah County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Paciorek
Defendant:
Utah County Jail and Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paciorek v. Lehi City et al
as 2:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Paciorek
Defendant:
Lehi City, Lehi Police Department, Mark Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paciorek v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
as 2:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Paciorek
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Aaron R Garcia
Defendant:
Joseph Wilson, Abrego Ka, T Odoherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bidwell v. Salt Lake City
as 2:2023cv00888
Plaintiff:
David Bidwell
Defendant:
Salt Lake City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodland v. Bishop et al
as 2:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Rodney Woodland
Defendant:
Cyndia Bishop, James Blanch and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
