US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 601
Joseph v. Target Stores Inc
as 1:2019cv00614
Defendant:
Target Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Annakutty Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abreu et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Abreu and Pedro Abreu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNaughton v. 3M Company
as 1:2019cv00541
Plaintiff:
Sandra N McNaughton
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glennon v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02821
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chris Glennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Carter v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Carter
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopaedics, L.L.C. and Biomet Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv00220
Plaintiff:
Martin N Gonzalez and Martin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00011
Plaintiff:
Patrick A Taylor and Sharon R Taylor
Defendant:
Biomet u.s. reconstruction, llc, Biomet Manufacturing Corp, Biomet Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porter v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 3:2019cv00007
Plaintiff:
Attorney Charlotte P. Hodges and Willie Claude Porter
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Synthes Company, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crampton-Humphreys v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00865
Defendant:
Biomet Manufacturing, LLC, Biomet u.s. reconstruction, llc, Biomet, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Crampton-Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
