US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
United States of America et al v. ManTech International Corporation
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Kevin Cody and Muge Cody
Defendant:
Mantech International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
LaMora v. Guidance Software, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01568
Plaintiff:
Jerry LaMora
Defendant:
Guidance Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Garzione v. PAE Government Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00833
Plaintiff:
Anthony Garzione
Defendant:
PAE Government Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Satterwhite et al
as 2:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Cynthia K. Satterwhite and Gastroenterology Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Tunstall v. Kindred Rehab Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jodi Tunstall
Defendant:
Kindred Rehab Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Fitzsimmons v. Cardiology Associates of Fredericksburg, LTD. et al
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
Cardiology Associates of Fredericksburg, Ltd. , Richard A. Lewis , Frank R. Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Little v. Quin Rivers, Incorporated
as 3:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jane Little
Defendant:
Quin Rivers, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Thompson v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2014cv01646
Plaintiff:
Maria Thompson
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Searle v. DRS Technical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Searle
Defendant:
DRS Technical Services Inc. , DRS C3 & Aviation Company and The Tolliver Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Besarra
as 2:2013cv00689
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Jhirmack Besarra
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
