US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,522
Oakes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Oakes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holloway v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Holloway
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Hassie Ann Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reynolds v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Sarah Beth Reynolds
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yates v. O'Malley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Melissa Yates
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williamson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tobias A. Williamson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hodges v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Sandra S. Hodges
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wickline v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Wickline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thatcher v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christa Amanda Thatcher
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dawn Baker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.