US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,547
Martin v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Cory Adam Martin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kersey v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Kersey
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Ballad Health et al
as 7:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
Ballad Health, M.D. Robert B. Jolley and R.N. Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ketchum v. S.W.V.R.J.A. Haysi et al
as 7:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ketchum
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A. Haysi, 2.223, 1.10038 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Roanoke City Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Nelson
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail, Lt. Earls, Sgt. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hagy et al
as 7:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Davis
Defendant:
Officer M. Hagy and Tikki Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Virginia D.O.C. et al
as 7:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dexter Wells
Defendant:
Virginia D.O.C. and Mississippi D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
