US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 91 - 100 of 25,042
Burns v. Spratley et al
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Candi L. Burns
Defendant:
Tobias J. Spratley, Paul F. Rajinder, Gurdev Trucking, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kurland v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ian Kurland
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Moore v. Spratley et al
as 6:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ian M. Moore
Defendant:
Tobias J. Spratley, Paul F. Rajinder, Gurdev Trucking, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Diggs v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Unit Manager B. Smith and Sergeant EC Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senter v. Haysi Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Alexander Senter
Defendant:
Haysi Regional Jail and Duffield Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Virginia Parole Board
as 7:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Barksdale
Defendant:
Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffit v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Richard M. Proffit
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffelt v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clay Coffelt
Defendant:
Rick White, Holmes and Principle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Brian Terelle Richardson
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Sgt. Dyer and C.O. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
