Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,434
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ridgeview IP LLC v. Anthology Inc.
as 1:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ridgeview IP LLC
Defendant:
Anthology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Ridgeview IP LLC v. Anthology Inc.
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ridgeview IP LLC
Defendant:
Anthology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01422
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01404
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Geoscope Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Geoscope Technologies Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv01348
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
