Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,037
Trent v. Williams
as 7:2024cv00859
Plaintiff: Cordero Antonio Trent
Defendant: LPD Officer Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00867
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Meyer et al
as 7:2024cv00857
Defendant: T. Meyer, Kyle Rosch, C. Holdren and others
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pentek v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff: Laszlo Pentek
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roscoe v. Turner et al
as 7:2024cv00852
Plaintiff: Emmitt G. Roscoe, Jr.
Defendant: Brown and Sgt. C.A. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00853
Defendant: C/O Robertson, Unit Manager Collins, Warden Anderson and others
Plaintiff: Eric Owen Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00854
Defendant: Slush, R. Blevins, Officer J. Artrip and others
Plaintiff: Aubrey McKay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamm v. Grear et al
as 7:2024cv00855
Plaintiff: Joseph W. Hamm, Jr.
Defendant: Dr. Greg Haynes and Dr. Heather Grear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daggs v. Maurice et al
as 7:2024cv00837
Defendant: Assistant Warden R. Bateman, Major J. Patterson and Warden R. Maurice
Plaintiff: Shane Daggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennington v. Morgan et al
as 7:2024cv00838
Defendant: Officer Roger Dowell, Officer April Morgan and Officer Dalton Pennington
Plaintiff: Wesley Pennington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?