US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 4,868
Bartlett v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Curtis William Bartlett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03087
Plaintiff:
Pamela G Lewis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sukert v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
Brianna Sukert
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
De La Fuente v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Virginia De La Fuente
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Floyd v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03084
Plaintiff:
Tommy Floyd
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bergquist v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bergquist
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alfaro Gonzalez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03082
Plaintiff:
Juan Alfaro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Philip v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05087
Plaintiff:
Kylee Noel Philip
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Layman v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03078
Plaintiff:
Brandy Danielle Layman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cox v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cox
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
