US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,398
Bell v. Perkins
as 2:2024cv01592
Petitioner:
Raymond Lamont Bell
Respondent:
Jefferey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatt, Jr. et al v. Strange
as 2:2024cv01591
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange
Plaintiff:
Donald R Holbrook, George Donald Hatt, Jr. and Dept. of Corrections For Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Anderson
as 2:2024cv01596
Respondent:
Lisa Anderson
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Witkowski v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05812
Petitioner:
William Howard Witkowski
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01499
Petitioner:
Peter James Carr
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Berto v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01491
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Casey C Berto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boardman v. Perkins
as 3:2024cv05777
Respondent:
Jefferey Perkins
Petitioner:
Thomas Russell Boardman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01439
Petitioner:
Bobby D Colbert
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Avington v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05749
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Dominique Avington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01391
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Dale Lane Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
