U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 556
Downey v. Snohomish County Corrections et al
as 2:2025cv01105
Plaintiff:
Mark Christopher Downey
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections and Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Kim
as 2:2025cv01028
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker
Defendant:
Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. King County Jail - DAJD et al
as 2:2025cv00989
Plaintiff:
Joshua G Fox
Defendant:
King County Jail - DAJD and Public Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Clark County Jail
as 3:2025cv05409
Plaintiff:
Alexis Crawford
Defendant:
Clark County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2025cv05393
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Dhaliwal
as 2:2025cv00859
Plaintiff:
Antonio McClain
Defendant:
Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Department of Public Health Seattle et al
as 2:2025cv00787
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Department of Public Health Seattle, King County Jail Health Services, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spitzer et al v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2025cv00771
Plaintiff:
James R Spitzer
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Cox et al
as 2:2025cv00765
Plaintiff:
Jason M Hart
Defendant:
Patrick Cox, Monica Bartz and Robin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Robbins et al
as 2:2025cv00582
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Amber Robbins, Gill, Allen Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
