US District Court for the Western District of Washington

Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 65,072
Randolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05318
Plaintiff: Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff: Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kyle-McFarland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00573
Plaintiff: Monica Kyle-McFarland
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Federal Trade Commission v. Doxo Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Doxo, Inc., Steve Shivers and Roger Parks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00568
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Doxo, Inc., Steve Shivers and Roger Parks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Su v. Amazon.com Services LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00270
Thompson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2024cv05311
Plaintiff: John L Thompson
Defendant: State of Washington, Kelly Montgomery, Susan Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?