Washington Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,024
Bikundwa v. Ruyenzi
as 2:2022cv01604
Petitioner:
Aimee Kidogi Bikundwa
Respondent:
Schadrack Ruyenzi
Meacham v. Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
as 1:2022cv03150
Plaintiff:
Billie Meacham
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Super Vape'z LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05789
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Super Vape'z LLC, Marco Hoffman, Heydee Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0301 Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act
State of Washington v. Schwartz Vays WA LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
State of Washington ex rel Larry Kasoff, State of Washington and Larry M Kasoff
Defendant:
Axela Technologies, Inc., Schwartz Vays WA, LLC, Schwartz Vays WA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re Application of Caterpillar Credito et al
as 2:2022cv01549
Petitioner:
Caterpiller Credito
In Re:
T-Mobile
Interested Party:
Carolina Elizabeth Varady de Bellosta and Carlos Mercelino Jose Bellosta Pallares
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd et al
as 2:2022cv01396
Petitioner:
Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd
In Re:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Henry v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05673
Plaintiff:
Nicholus Rolfton Henry
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Pullen-Umhra v. Department of Defense
as 3:2022mc05015
Petitioner:
Nicole Pullen-Umhra
Respondent:
Department of Defense
In Re:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Umhra, II v. Department of Defense
as 3:2022mc05014
Petitioner:
Michael A Umhra, II
Respondent:
Department of Defense
In Re:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.