Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,172
Kloepfel v. Cowles et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Joseph Kloepfel
Defendant:
Raymond Cowles, Dan Dice and Unknown Agents, US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 4:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Raymond Darnell Brown
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Spokane County, Dr Elliot Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silva v. Lewis County Prosecutor's Office
as 3:2024cv05504
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Silva
Defendant:
Lewis County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Western State Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv05498
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Silva
Defendant:
Western State Hospital and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. WA Department of Health Care
as 4:2024cv05062
Plaintiff:
Richard L Harrington
Defendant:
WA Department of Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feitser v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Yuri A Feitser
Defendant:
Washington State Penitentiary, Daniel Cockre, Airway Heights Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craven v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv05461
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A Craven
Defendant:
Davis and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kloepfel v. Hammer et al
as 3:2024cv05456
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Joseph Kloepfel
Defendant:
Hammer and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
