Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,143
Dixon v. Cole et al
as 4:2024cv05003
Plaintiff:
Robert E Dixon
Defendant:
Amanda Cole, A Hogar, C Kairos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Securus Technologies
as 4:2024cv05004
Plaintiff:
Harvey S Johnson
Defendant:
Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmadi v. King County
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ratib Ahmadi
Defendant:
King County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knoeb v. Yakima County DOC et al
as 1:2023cv03207
Plaintiff:
Roy Castillo Knoeb, III
Defendant:
Yakima County DOC and Shelton WA Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. American Behavioral Health Systems et al
as 2:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
American Behavioral Health Systems, Mulmur, Zaun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Brian Sanchez
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Oscar G. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2023cv06191
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kane v. Waldo
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Waldo and Troy Stull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
as 1:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Roderick Deray Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Yakima County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
Tatum Kimble
Defendant:
Yakima County Jail and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
