US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 152
Barbour et al v. Sun Energy Services, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv08460
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barbour , Raylin Boudreaux , Gerry Hardy and others
Defendant:
Sun Energy Services, LLC , Tracy Weekly and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
DeLoso, et. al. v. Multifresh, Inc.
as 5:2012cv01165
Plaintiff:
Gregorio DeLoso , Shane Duvigneaud and George T. Starr, III
Defendant:
Multifresh, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Deemer v. Hi-Lad, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Deemer
Defendant:
Hi-Lad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tee v. Brown Reporting Agency, Inc., et. al.
as 5:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Loretta Tee
Defendant:
Brown Reporting Agency, Inc. , H. David Stanley and Carolyn Sue Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodruff v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Natasha Woodruff
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. , Kroger Limited Partnership I , Harley Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman v. Prestera Center for Mental Health Services, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Kenya Chapman
Defendant:
Prestera Center for Mental Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
White v. Roark-Sullivan Lifeway Center, Inc.
as 2:2011cv01014
Plaintiff:
Gavin White
Defendant:
Roark-Sullivan Lifeway Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Bryant v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
as 2:2011cv00604
Plaintiff:
Peggy Bryant
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ellis v. Forte Staffing, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00605
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ellis
Defendant:
Forte Staffing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
