West Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,741
Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jason Gonzales
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moats v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tonya Marie Moats
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nicholas v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Sherman Voy Nicholas, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lasure v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ann Lasure
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Crabtree v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Crabtree
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crawford v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Chrystina L. Crawford
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Isaacs v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jack Isaacs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Loudy v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Lynn Loudy
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hanna v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hanna
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
