Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 3,632
Ranjel v. Warden Keyes
as 2:2023cv00996
Petitioner:
Robert Ranjel
Respondent:
Warden Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Truckey, Justin v. Gierach
as 3:2023cv00500
Petitioner:
Justin Michael Truckey
Respondent:
Warden Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. McDermott
as 1:2023cv00971
Petitioner:
Donna Rae Matthews
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv00966
Petitioner:
Oscar L Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Keys
as 3:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
Shariff Miller
Respondent:
R D Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Buesgen
as 2:2023cv00965
Petitioner:
Romaine J Reed
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Keys
as 1:2023cv00961
Petitioner:
Shariff Miller
Respondent:
R D Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brik, Vladimir v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00478
Petitioner:
Vladimir Vladimirovich Brik
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pemberton, James v. Walker, Kyle et al
as 3:2023cv00476
Petitioner:
James B. Pemberton, II.
Respondent:
Kyle Walker, ADA Jessica Miller and DA Kenneth Hamm
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al Bawi v. Wiersma
as 1:2023cv00940
Petitioner:
Ahmed Ali Mohsin Al Bawi
Respondent:
Administrator Lance Wiersma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
