Smith v. Little et al (INMATE2)
| Darrick D. Smith |
| Lawson Little, Douglas A. Valeska, Bruce Smith, Mark Johnson and Jack Blummenfield |
| 1:2008cv00886 |
| November 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Houston |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Wallace Capel |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDERED as follows: (1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Defendants Little, Valeska, Johnson,and Blumenfeld are DISMISSED with prejudice ; (3) Plaintiff's c hallenge to the constitutionality of his pending criminal charge is DISMISSED without prejudice as further set out; and (4) This suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED prior to service of process as further set out. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/3/2008. (cb, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 11/10/2008. (cb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
