Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)

as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Woodall et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2018cv00748
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Patrick B. Jones, III and Carla Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Houston County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2016cv00838
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston County Sheriff's Office, Douglas A. Valeska, Donald Valenza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Hall et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Ronald Hall and Douglas A. Valeska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)

as 1:2015cv00913
Plaintiff:
Kharon Torchec Davis
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, Douglas A. Valeska and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tullis v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lisa McKinley Tullis
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ray Wiehe, Kim Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Dothan Police Department et al (INMATE 2)

as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Dothan Police Department, Jason Adkins, Marc Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.