Johnson v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
| Tommy James Johnson, Jr. |
| Andy R. Hughes, Commander Reed, Doctor Banner, Jason Smoak, A.B.L. Food Services and Kim Turner |
| 1:2009cv00829 |
| August 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Houston |
| Ira De Ment |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failure to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of the Court. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 1/5/2010. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
11
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of this court. Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 12/10/2009. (br, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 9/4/09. (br, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
