Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lambert v. District Court of Houston County et al(MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Lambert
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Houston County Alabama, Brady E. Mendheim, Jr., Douglas A. Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russaw v. Hughes et al(INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
Michael Russaw
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes, State of Alabama and Douglas Valeska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Powers v. Hughes, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2011cv00720
Plaintiff:
Grover Leroy Powers
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes, Keith Reed and K. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windsor v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Montana Jordan Windsor
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes and Keith Reeds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hughes et al (INAMTE3)
as 2:2010cv01101
Plaintiff:
Terreko Demese Thomas
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-13282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Corbin v. Hughes et al
as 1:2010cv00596
Plaintiff:
Patricia Corbin
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes , Houston County Sheriff's Department and TASER International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2009cv00856
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Sanders
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes and Keith Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy R. Hughes, Commander Reed, Doctor Banner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
