Adams v. Baskin et al (INMATE 2)
| Brandon Adams |
| Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Brooks, Officer Crawford, C Giles and C. Baskin |
| 2:2019cv00009 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
Response to Order re #19 Order by C. Baskin, Officer Crawford, C Giles. (Carmack, Bettie)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER: It is ORDERED that the #15 objection to the U.S. Magistrate Judge's #14 order is overruled. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/25/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 3/11/2019, Dft Brooks shall file a response in this case which advises the court whether he will seek legal representation in this matter pursuant to the information provided him in this regard by General Counsel for the AL DOC; DIRECTING the Clerk to furnish a copy of this order to Dft Brooks via certified mail, to General Counsel for the AL DOC, and counsel of record. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/25/2019. (Copy mailed CMRRR to Dft Brooks & regular mail to General Counsel for the AL DOC as directed) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 21
SEALED RESPONSE to Order re #14 Order by Alabama Department of Corrections. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time; Dfts Baskin, Giles, and Crawford are GRANTED an extension from 2/21/2019, to and including 4/22/2019, to file their answer and written report. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/21/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 3/7/2019, counsel for dfts shall contact appropriate officials at Bullock to determine if any video recordings of the alleged incidents are available and, if such recordings are available, ensure preservation of the recordings for submission to this court; further ORDERED that on or before 3/14/2019, counsel for dfts shall file a notice with this court advising of the results of the inquiry addressed in this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/20/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 18
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by C. Baskin, Officer Crawford, C Giles. (Carmack, Bettie)
|
|
Filing 17
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer by C. Baskin, Officer Crawford, C Giles. (Carmack, Bettie)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER denying #14 Motion for Reconsideration; DIRECTING the Clerk to furnish General Counsel for the AL DOC with a copy of this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/20/2019. (Copy mailed to General Counsel for the AL DOC as directed) (alm, )
|
|
AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for C. Baskin, Officer Crawford, & C Giles. (No pdf attached to this entry) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 15
Objection to #14 Order / MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Alabama Department of Corrections. (Carmack, Bettie) Modified on 2/15/2019 to add as filed on behalf of Interested Party AL DOC & to remove as filed on behalf of T. Brooks (alm, ).
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 2/22/2019, General Counsel or her designee shall file under seal the address used to mail to Dft Terrance Brooks the 1/31/2019, certified letter as referenced in said response. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/15/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER denying #12 Motion to Quash Service of Process; to the extent the #12 filing is considered a motion for leave to file a motion to dismiss Dft T. Brooks, it is ORDERED that the #12 motion for leave is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/15/2019. (alm, )
|
|
MOTION for Reconsideration re #14 Order, by Alabama Department of Corrections. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #15 for pdf) (alm, )
|
|
PURSUANT TO THE #12 MOTION - ***Attorney Bettie J. Carmack for Interested Party Alabama Department of Corrections added; Attorney Bettie J. Carmack for Dft T. Brooks terminated. (No pdf attached to this entry) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Quash Service of Process, or in the Alternative, MOTION to Dismiss T. Brooks for Insufficient Service of Process (CONSIDERED a Motion for Leave to file a Motion to Dismiss Dft T. Brooks, pursuant to the Court's #13 Order) by Alabama Department of Corrections. (Carmack, Bettie). Added MOTION to Quash on 2/8/2019 (alm, ). Modified on 2/8/2019 to clarify the docket text & to add as filed on behalf of AL DOC & to remove as filed on behalf of T. Brooks (alm, ) Modified on 2/15/2019 (alm, ).
|
|
Filing 11
Response to Order re #9 Order, by Alabama Department of Corrections. (McCollum, Carrie) Modified on 2/8/2019 to add as filed on behalf of Interested Party AL DOC & to remove as filed on behalf of Ms. McCollum (alm, )
|
|
Filing 10
Return Receipt Card showing service of #9 Order signed by Kristi Simpson for DOC General Counsel served on 1/29/2019. (kr, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) On or before 2/8/2019, General Counsel for the AL DOC shall advise the Court of whether General Counsel or General Counsel's designee will accept service and provide representation for Dft T. Brooks; 2) The answer and special report filing deadline set forth in the Court's #4 order of procedure as it relates to Dft Brooks is STAYED generally until further order; DIRECTING the Clerk to provide a copy of this order via certified mail to the General Counsel for the AL DOC. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/25/2019. (Copy mailed CMRRR to General Counsel for the AL DOC as directed) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 8
Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order signed by Olivia Hicks for C Giles served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 7
Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order signed by Olivia Hicks for C. Baskin served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Service package containing #1 Complaint & #4 Order sent to Officer T. Brooks was returned with the following notations: "Return to Sender" & "Attn: This person is no longer employed with us". (No pdf attached to this entry) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 6
Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order signed by Olivia Hicks for Officer Crawford served on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 5
Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order signed by Olivia Hicks for T. Brooks served on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/21/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 2/21/2019; copies mailed to plf; mailed by CMRRR with #1 complaint to Dfts Baskin, Brooks, Giles, and Crawford; mailed regular mail to General Counsel for the AL DOC & to the Attorney General for the State of AL. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/10/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Donaldson C.F. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/9/2019. (Furnished: Cashier) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Brandon Adams. (beh, )
|
|
Filing 1
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, C. Baskin, T. Brooks, Officer Crawford, C Giles, filed by Brandon Adams.(beh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
