Cases 1 - 10 of 191
SPEICHER et al v. ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC
as 5:2022cv04284
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. SPEICHER, PATRICIA C. GILES, JEREMY G. SPEICHER and others
Defendant:
ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Giles v. EEOC of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv01483
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. Giles
Defendant:
EEOC of Minneapolis, Karen Seymour, Ms. Lauren Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Aliance Giles
as 21-1857
Defendant / Appellant:
Aliance C. Giles
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. v. Fast Lane Powersports, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07021
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Giles and Fast Lane Powersports, Inc.
Plaintiff:
TCF Inventory Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
GILES et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ELENA GILES and WILLIAM C. GILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Giles v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2019cv00203
Defendant:
Dauphin County and Dauphin County Domestic Relations
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Baskin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Brooks, Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Shreveport Police Dept et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Kemp
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Dept, Pierce, Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles et v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06348
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sandra C. Giles and Richard E. Giles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
