Lanford v. Tipton et al (INMATE 3)
| Rickey Glenn Lanford |
| Charles Tipton, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and Scott Rogers |
| 2:2020cv00820 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| No objections filed to the #2 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry) (cwl, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER ON MOTION: it is ORDERED that Lanford's Motion for Leave to Amend and Add Defs (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/4/2020. (cwl, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Amend and Add Defendants re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Rickey Glenn Lanford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Attachment)(cwl, ) |
| Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Objections to R&R due by 10/30/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/16/2020. (cwl, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Rickey Glenn Lanford.(NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(hrs, ) Modified on 10/16/2020 to correct spelling of plf name (cwl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
