Thomas v. Marshall et al (INMATE 2)
Johnny Mack Thomas |
Delores Woodham, Steven T. Marshall, Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, Chief District Attorney and Dale County, Alabama |
2:2021cv00391 |
June 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
R Austin Huffaker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $277.85 be paid on or before 8/12/2021; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until $350 fee is paid in full, as further set out in order; granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Limestone Corr Fac. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 7/22/2021. Furnished to cashier. (djy, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Johnny Mack Thomas. (es, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Delores Woodham, Chief District Attorney and Dale County, Alabama filed by Johnny Mack Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(es, ) Modified on 6/4/2021 to include as against two other defendants (qc/djy, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.