Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
Samuel Calvin Allen |
Mary B. Windom, Officer Menclheim, Officer Cook, Officer Parker, Officer Sellers, J. J., Officer Mitchell, Officer Stewart, C.J., Officer Shaw, Off. Bryan and Kelli Wise |
2:2024cv00296 |
May 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Emily C Marks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. #2 ) is ADOPTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241(d) and 28 U.S.C. 1631. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/3/2024. (CWL) |
Case transferred to Northern District of Alabama. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF to Clerk. (CWL) |
No objections received re #2 Recommendation. (no pdf) (CWL) |
Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. 2241(d) and 28 U.S.C. 1631. Objections to R&R due by 6/18/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 6/4/2024. (CWL) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Samuel Calvin Allen. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(HRR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.