Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 6:2026cv01165
Plaintiff:
Kahbarius Jackson
Defendant:
Officer Mitchell and Officer Barraza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Brown et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00409
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Warden Brown, Warden Luckett, Cpt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond v. Frazer et al
as 1:2026cv22580
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Corporal Frazer, Officer Alexis and Officer Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Ewing
as 26-6324
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
EWING, Sergeant, Wallens Ridge State Prison Hearing Officer, OFFICER NELSON, CHRISTOPHER KING and others
Dumond, Daniel v. Fraser et al
as 1:2026cv20238
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Corporal R. Fraser, Officer F. Alexis and Officer Mitchel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazzle v. Pinckney-Martinez et al
as 1:2025cv13729
Defendant:
Sgt. Noble Greg, Sgt. Lark Kevin, Officer L. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Deangelo Brazzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ray v. Officer Mitchell et al
as 4:2025cv05242
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Ray
Defendant:
Officer Mitchell and Officer Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Stanford et al
as 2:2025cv13252
Plaintiff:
Hershel Greene
Defendant:
Officer Mitchell Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02328
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Meyers v. Ewing et al
as 7:2025cv00769
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Ewing, Officer Nelson, Christopher King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
