Murry v. Floyd et al
| Montel Deon Murry |
| Bernard Williams, Wendy Kelley, David White, Geneva Brooks Sergeant, Mary Beth Floyd, Ruth Marie Skrapates, Geraldine G Campbell and David Brewer |
| 1:2012cv00095 |
| September 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Izard |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 74 Order entered today, the case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/30/2013. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER re 70 MOTION to Compel filed by Ruth Marie Skrapates, Mary Beth Floyd, Geraldine G Campbell. Plaintiff shall file a response within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/9/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/10/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 5 the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition; and dismissing Defendants Geneva Brooks Sergeant, David White, Bernard Williams, and Wendy Kelley from this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/4/2012. (kdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
