Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Wells v. Reeves et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Barry Wells
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Mississippi Attorney General, Pike County DA Dee Bates and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack Foster v. David Brewer et al
as 2:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Jack Foster
Defendant:
David Brewer, A Nguyen, Alyssa Bostrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slaughter, et al. v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC.
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Gerard Stephen Slaughter and David Brewer Slaughter
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jones v. Brewer et al
as 7:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sean Jones
Defendant:
David Brewer and Lucius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BREWER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29381
Plaintiff:
DAVID BREWER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Sammy Garcia
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garcia v. Brewer
as 7:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Sammy Garcia
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
