Murphy v. Hughes et al
| Lisa R Murphy |
| Joseph Hughes, Booker, Ervin, Schulz, Faust, Dixon, Weekley, Williams and Powell |
| 1:2014cv00064 |
| June 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER adopting 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing plaintiff's 2 Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/11/2015. (ks)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 24 Partial Report and Recommendations. The 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Irving and Schulz is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/25/2014. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER directing the Clerk to change the style of the case to reflect the Defendants' correct names. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/8/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Partial Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge: Defendants Faust, Dixon, Weekley, Williams and Powell are DISMISSED from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/4/2014. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
