Scarver v. Bradley et al
Plaintiff: Stasia Scarver
Defendant: Lori Reeves, Arkansas Department of Correction, Jackson County and A Kittrell
Case Number: 1:2018cv00017
Filed: March 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Batesville Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER denying as moot 56 Motion. The Court already granted Scarver permission to appeal in forma pauperis, No. 52 . Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/23/2018. (jak)
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 JUDGMENT: Scarver's claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/13/2018. (jak)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 .ORDER adopting 32 Partial Recommendation. Scarver' s claims against Reeves are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/28/2018. (jak)
June 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: The Court stands by its 5/1/2018 Order, No. 9 and overrules 30 Objections. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/7/2018. (jak)
May 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying without prejudice 20 Motion to reconsider. If Scarver wants to file belated objections to the recommendation, then she must do so by 5/31/2018. The Court will then reconsider the recommendation and its 5/1/2018 Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/15/2018. (jak)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER adopting 8 Partial Recommendation. Scarver's claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice. Her claims against Jackson County are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/1/2018. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scarver v. Bradley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stasia Scarver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Kittrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?