Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
| Frederick Banks |
| Barack Obama, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Eric Holder, United States Bureau of Prisons, Thomas Kane, Timothy C Outlaw, Donna Zickefoose, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Bier, Thomas, Mike Doyle and Does |
| 2:2011cv00191 |
| October 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| St. Francis |
| James M. Moody |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT re 46 Order dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/10/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 35 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by Frederick Banks. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/29/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 22 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 21 Motion filed by Frederick Banks. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/25/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 10 Partial Report and Recommendations and allowing plaintiff to proceed with his claims against defts T.C. Outlaw, Donna Zickefoose, Bier, and Thomas. Plaintiff's claims against defts Bureau of Indian Affairs, Dept. of the Interior, Eric Holder, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Thomas Kane, Mike Doyle, Barack Obama, FBI, and Does are dismissed with prejudice and removed as party defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/20/11. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
