Winston v. Etherly et al
Charles A Winston |
Danny Burl, C Bogan, James Gibson, Larry D May, Ray Artist Hobbs, Marcus I Etherly, Valarie Westbrook, Thester Petty, Lathan E Ester, Gregory Harmon, Harris and Maurice Williams |
2:2012cv00084 |
May 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Lincoln |
James M. Moody |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 39 Order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Marcus I. Etherly, and without prejudice in all other respects; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/1/2013. (dmn) |
Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 11 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's claims against all defts other than deft Marcus I. Etherly, without prejudice. The names of the other defts as parties should be removed. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/3/12. (kpr) |
Filing 13 ORDER if pltf wishes to file the documents that he filed in another case on 7/23/12, he should resubmit them with the appropriate case number. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/25/12. (vjt) |
Filing 10 ORDER directing the U.S. Marshal to serve summons, 8 Amended Complaint, and this Order on deft Etherly without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/17/12. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.