Lewis v. Green et al
| Arthur C Lewis, Jr |
| Charlotte Green, Harris, C Davis, Ball, Carlo, Strickland, Gardner, Hughes, Murry, Arkansas Department of Correction, Horton and Corizon |
| 2:2013cv00073 |
| June 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER denying 121 Motion to Alter Judgment and for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/25/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
120
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 119 Order entered separately today, this case is dismissed with prejudice. All relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/11/2015. (ks)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file within 30 days, a Response to 100 and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that comply with the instructions set forth in this Order. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in: (a) all of the facts in Defendants' summary judgment papers being deemed admitted by Plaintiff; or (b) the dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/09/2014. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER adopting 71 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Defendants' 56 motion for partial summary judgment is granted in part and den ied in part. (2) Lewis's claims against Green, Gardner, Davis, and Horton are dismissed without prejudice due to lack of exhaustion. (3) Lewis may proceed with his inadequate medical care and corrective inaction claims against Ball, Hughes, Butler, Strickland, Yarbrough, and Harris. (4) It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/5/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file within 30 days a Response to 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Latrice Harris, Charlotte Green, Strickland, Dottie Yarbrough, Don Wesley Ball, Joseph Hughes, Charlotte Gardner, Debra Horton, C hiquita Davis, Quilble Butler and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that comply with the instructions set forth in this Order. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in: (a) all of the facts in 56 being admitted by Plaintiff; or (b) the dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 03/11/2014. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's claims against Carlo and Murry are dismissed without prejudice due to lack of service. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/11/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, the Clerk is directed to correct name of deft Yarbrough; pltf's claims against deft ADC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the claims against deft Corizon Inc are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; pltf may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against defts Green, Harris, Davis, Ball, Carlo, Strickland, Gardner, Hughes, Murry, Horton, Butler, and Yarbrough; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaint (pages 1 through 42), amended complaint, and this Order on these defts without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/20/13. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
