Morgan v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Jeffery D Morgan |
| Arkansas Department of Correction, Danny Burl, DeAngelo Earl, M Allen, Corizon Inc, Lanchewy, M Branscomb, Debra Horton, Sherman, Okoye Nwannem, Ray Hobbs and Larry May |
| 2:2013cv00164 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lee |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 118 Order filed this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice with respect to plaintiff Jefferey D. Morgan's claims against defendants Monicka Branscomb and the ADC an d dismissed without prejudice in all other respects; the relief sough is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/28/2015. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that Mr. Morgan's claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice, and the Arkansas Department of Correction is removed as a party defendant. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/2/2014. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
