Askew v. Ford et al
| Brandon Askew |
| Rodney Ford, James Munn, Davis, Roosevelt Barden, F Scott and Jones |
| 2:2016cv00163 |
| November 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Helena Office |
| Lincoln |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 70 Order, Brandon Askew's complaint and amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/1/2019. (cmn)
|
|
Filing
52
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/9/2017. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER approving and adopting the 6 Recommended Partial Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff Brandon Askew's claims against each defendant in his or her official capa city; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Askew's claims against defendants Davis and Jones; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Askew's inadequate medical care claim against defendant James Munn; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Askew's retaliation and excessive force claims against all defendants; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
