Talley v. McDaniel et al
Myka B Talley |
Kimble, McDaniel, Gregory Rechcigl, Cook and Kirkwood |
2:2018cv00133 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Myka B Talley.(kdr) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to the Court by Myka B Talley. (kdr) |
Filing 3 ORDER the Clerk is directed to mail Talley a 1983 complaint form labeled "Amended Complaint"; Talley must file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the entry date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/27/18. (tjb) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing plaintiff's custodian to collect an initial partial filing fee of $8.67 and forward that amount to the Clerk; the custodian must collect monthly payments equal to 20% of the preceding month's income each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/26/18. (tjb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Myka B Talley. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Myka B Talley. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.