Castro-Hernandez v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Anael Castro-Hernandez |
| Dale Reed, Tanya Timmons, Arkansas Department of Correction and Jeremy Andrews |
| 2:2020cv00225 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to amend #10 . The Court will only consider claims properly pled in a complaint or in a superseding amended complaint. Plaintiff was notified that the Court will not consider claims stated in notices or other pleadings not filed in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 3 at 2.) And pursuant to Judge Rudofsky's 12/11/2020 order, Doc. No. 12, Plaintiff shall amend his complaint within 30 days. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a complaint form. Failure to file a properly amended complaint will result in dismissal of this cause of action. Plaintiff's motion for discovery is denied #11 . Requests for discovery are not filed with the Court. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that requests for discovery should not be filed with the court but should be mailed directly to the Defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1), 26, Loc. R. 7.2, 26.1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/18/2020. (lej)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part #4 proposed findings and recommendations; and referring the claims against Defendant Timmons, Reed, and Andrews back Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 12/11/2020. (ajt)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Discovery by Anael Castro-Hernandez. (ljb) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint by Anael Castro-Hernandez. (ljb) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Anael Castro-Hernandez. (ljb) |
|
Filing 8
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 Motion to Extend Time. Objections to the #4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations must be filed by 12/21/2020. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 12/07/2020. (bgr)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time by Anael Castro-Hernandez. (ljb) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Admissions by Anael Castro-Hernandez. (llg) |
| Filing 5 INTERROGATORIES as to Rule 33 by Anael Castro-Hernandez.(llg) |
|
Filing 4
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice #2 . Dismissal count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/18/2020. (lej)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Delta Regional Unit Warden, ADC Trust Bank, and the ADC Compliance Office. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/18/2020. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Anael Castro-Hernandez.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anael Castro-Hernandez. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
