Stinson v. Cauley et al
| Mark T Stinson, Sr |
| K Cauley, Hall, Thomas, Ridge, A Frazier, Watkins, McAlister, D Hendrix, McDaniels, Clintscale, H Walker, Rendon and B Schmidt |
| 2:2022cv00219 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #31 Notice of Appeal. (jbh) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (jbh) |
Filing 30
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION recommending #14 motion for summons be denied; recommending service of process not be ordered; recommending this case be dismissed, and with prejudice; recommending an in forma pauperis appeal of an order and judgment dismissing the case at bar be deemed frivolous and not taken in good faith. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 1/30/2023. (jbh)
|
| Filing 29 USCA ORDER as to #28 USCA Mandamus Letter: The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Mr. Stinson is hereby directed to pay the full filing fee to the clerk of the U.S. District Court no later than 2/27/2023. No further action will be taken in this case until the filing fee is paid in full. Failure to pay the fee will result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice. (jbh) |
| Filing 28 USCA Docketing Letter. Petition for Writ of Mandamus has been filed and assigned case number 23-1111. (Retrieved from PACER on 1/20/2023.) (jbh) |
|
Filing 27
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Harris for all matters except trial (if we get there). This includes an initial screening of the complaint, pursuant to the PLRA, as well as addressing the pending Motion at #14 . Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/17/2023. (hml)
|
|
Filing 26
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #18 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. This appeal would be frivolous. Plaintiff appears to be unhappy that a summons has not issued yet. But that is because the case must first go through screening pursuant to the PLRA. This case has only recently been transferred to the Court from another District. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/17/2023. (hml)
|
|
Filing 25
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER finding as moot #7 Motion to Submit Writ of Mandamus. This Motion is moot in light of the Order and Judgment from the 8th Circuit, dated December 19, 2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/17/2023. (hml)
|
|
Filing 24
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #5 Motion for Summary Judgment. This Motion is premature. The Complaint has not yet been screened under the PLRA. Only after screening and (potential) service would a summary judgment motion be appropriate. Even then, summary judgment is not usual until the close of discovery. This denial is without prejudice to refiling the Motion at an appropriate time. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/17/2023. (hml)
|
| Filing 23 USCA MANDATE in accordance with the judgment of 1/12/2023 as to #21 USCA Mandamus Letter. (jbh) |
| Filing 22 USCA JUDGMENT as to #21 USCA Mandamus Letter: Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. The case is dismissed. (jbh) |
| Filing 21 USCA Docketing Letter. Petition for Writ of Mandamus has been filed and assigned case number 23-1045. (jbh) |
| Filing 20 Amended NOTICE OF APPEAL by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (jbh) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (No separate document filed; see docket entry #18 .) (jbh) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (jbh) |
| Filing 17 USCA MANDATE in accordance with the judgment of 12/19/2022 as to #15 USCA Mandamus Letter. (jbh) |
| Filing 16 USCA JUDGMENT as to #15 USCA Mandamus Letter: Petition for writ of mandamus has been considered by the court and is denied. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson Sr. is granted. (jbh) |
| Filing 15 USCA Docketing Letter. Petition for Writ of Mandamus has been filed and assigned case number 22-3590. (Retrieved from PACER on 12/19/2022.) (jbh) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Summons under Federal Rules Civil Procedure Rule 4(c)(3) filed by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (fjg) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing Agreement to Receive Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (fjg) |
| Filing 12 Case electronically transferred in from District of Tennessee Western; Case Number 2:22-cv-02611. Electronic file copy of transfer order, case file, and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF TRANSFER, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 12/02/2022. (Mays, Samuel) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
| Filing 10 Motion to Transfer Case Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) filed by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. (mlk) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 9 USCA Case Number 22-5998 for #8 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. Transcript needed: n. (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Submit Writ of Mandamus by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. (agj) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 6 COA NOTICE: Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. Petition Received in 6CA: 10/24/2022. COA case number 22-5942. (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. (jae) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/03/2022. (Mays, Samuel) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Pauper Status)(csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT Under Federal Question Bivens Act 28 U.S.C. 1331 against All Defendants, filed by Mark T. Stinson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Judicial Cards)(csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
